They're asking us to do it on their terms.
They know what they're doing. A divide and conquer.
Although, it is legitimate. If I don't like the results, I'll stop playing.
I do want the special 15 to recognize that they are being used as props.
Couffer wrote:This is only a step towards progress, we should at least see how they respond to initial "negotiations". If the majority are still not satisfied we can always start round two, the only way to definitely lose (in my opinion) is not to engage.
Hme wrote:We are engaging already.
They're asking us to do it on their terms.
They know what they're doing. A divide and conquer.
Although, it is legitimate. If I don't like the results, I'll stop playing.
I do want the special 15 to recognize that they are being used as props.
Hme wrote:Seriously? I've been a long time player and a good friend and as a result of stating an opinion here have gained four negative votes? Same with Isabella? Would someone who down voted me care to explain?
pianofingers wrote:Hme wrote:Seriously? I've been a long time player and a good friend and as a result of stating an opinion here have gained four negative votes? Same with Isabella? Would someone who down voted me care to explain?
HME, I vote you up as well, because you're not afraid to speak your mind.
About the negatives votes - if you scroll up this page, you can see which posts got the negative votes, they're the ones with the red marks. I believe it was the post where you mentioned an "in crowd". I don't think there's an elite or exclusive group in here. If some members appear to be more familiar with each other, it's because they join the online chat. You might feel you're missing out, because some recent discussions (particularly the upcoming Skype call) were conducted over chat.
IsabellaBeckett wrote:I am new to this forum and certainly don't feel I deserve negative votes for expressing my opinion. I didn't even know about this option until Hme pointed it out lol. How do I up vote?
I do not think it is too much to ask of GI to address us all. I, too, have been on the other side of this and would never ask my customers to elect 15 representatives - that is a great way to not have enough customers to find 15 reps.
I do not expect or want them to arrange a call for the masses. I feel that they should update us through their Facebook page, as well as by utilizing the many other options available to companies to provide reasonable customer service (see Hme's post - survey, etc).
Thanks Couffer and pianofingers for supporting our posts. I don't think I said anything offensive and am really disappointed that some of the other members are not open to dissent (hmmmmm they are sounding an awful lot like GI....). It is sad that they would vote our posts down and not have the decency to explain why. Not a great way to make a new member feel valued
IsabellaBeckett wrote:
Isabella. One votes by using the + - signs on the right side of the post.
Mags UFF wrote:IsabellaBeckett wrote:
Isabella. One votes by using the + - signs on the right side of the post.
Thanks for answering my question
I don't have + / - signs next to posts. Maybe because I am a new member?
I understand what you are saying, and respect your desire to simply open communication but I think we deserve more. I think it is pretty crazy that with all of the issues this game has had, they have not chosen to be more forthright with their customers prior to now. And as far as focus groups are concerned, generally, they are for product launches, improvements, etc.
When a company has infuriated their base to the level that their base retaliates through a boycott, I feel that they owe it to their customers as a whole to provide a reasonable explanation (why haven't they addressed the questions about the apples rules regarding friend codes and why would they need to do this in any way other than publicly - it is, after all, a pretty simple request).
I really appreciate that you did not do that Mags, and if I could, I would definitely up vote you
I guess I just have different expectations. I am just surprised that this caused people to anonymously attack them.
IsabellaBeckett wrote:
Isabella. One votes by using the + - signs on the right side of the post.
Sharbee wrote:gailg mirrors my thoughts exactly.
Could you also point out bringing back the Monster Hunt event was a scam too? Rather than start afresh, they arranged it so people picked up from where they left off last time. As a result, there weren't enough monsters to get anywhere close to completion this time around. And, by removing the 'add friends' option, well, that doesn't need explaining.
Thanks.
Misato wrote:I didn't see this in the list on page 1
Quests shouldn't take months to complete. For example the Neptune and Emerald quests which can take months and months and their explanation of 'it's all a matter of luck' doesn't make me feel any better about waiting.
Misato wrote:As of the latest update you can now gift your Neptune and Emerald to those who are doing the quests.
You're kidding!!! So how do you add the Emerald to your wish list? I'm not seeing it!